Search result · source text not verified
The autonomous cybersecurity team that uses frontier intelligence to continuously discover, fix, and prevent security risks.
Products
We could read the site overview, but could not identify its products or services.
No matching products or features.
Customer feedback
Search result · source text not verified
0.security launches 0cloud to find and fix vulnerabilities inside GitHub pull requests
No feedback found.
Marketing & Ads
No matching ads were found in the sources checked.
Website marketing
Talk to us | 0.security ↗
Send feedback, discuss enterprise security testing or get in touch with the 0.security team.
Observed Nov 12, 2026
Talk to us | 0.security ↗
Send feedback, discuss enterprise security testing or get in touch with the 0.security team.
Observed Nov 12, 2026
New pages
First archived Source ↗
about ↗
From a kernel finding to an upstream fix ↗
Finding the function wasn't enough ↗
A real bug. An incorrect claim of novelty. ↗
Testing a Windows driver without its source ↗
Finding a bug in a stripped binary ↗
What a clean sanitizer run doesn't prove ↗
What maintainer review adds to AI research ↗
Your validator checked one value. Your app used another. ↗
Published Source ↗
What counts as proof depends on the target ↗
Published Source ↗
A length field the NFC parser trusted ↗
Published Source ↗
When the test needs an authorization rule ↗
Published Source ↗
Can a researcher find your security contact? ↗
Published Source ↗
What we lost when we filtered the findings ↗
Published Source ↗
Before comparing scores, check what ran ↗
Published Source ↗
Why we gave the agent a shell ↗
Published Source ↗
Keep the investigation outside the context window ↗
Published Source ↗
Replacing a native SQLite dependency ↗
Published Source ↗
Introducing 0cloud ↗
Published Source ↗
Test what an AI application can actually do ↗
Published Source ↗
Give the verifier a fresh start ↗
Published Source ↗
What our npm audits taught us ↗
Published Source ↗
Security review has to follow the change ↗
Brand colors & fonts
Observed website styles · partial · Nov 12, 2026
accent · inferred
Source ↗primary · inferred
Source ↗accent · inferred
Source ↗accent · inferred
Source ↗accent · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗background · inferred
Source ↗text · inferred
Source ↗Geist Variable
body · declared in stylesheet · 100 900
Fallback: system-ui, sans-serif
monospace
mono · declared in stylesheet ·
Fallback: ui-monospace, monospace
ui-monospace
mono · declared in stylesheet ·
Fallback: ui-monospace, monospace
Satoshi Variable
ui · declared in stylesheet · 300 900
Fallback: system-ui, sans-serif
Coverage Satoshi
other · declared in stylesheet · 300 900, 400
Fallback: system-ui, sans-serif
Geist Variable
other · declared in stylesheet · 100 900, 400
Fallback: system-ui, sans-serif
Disclaimer: These samples are not verified official brand guidelines or a complete palette. Previews use system fonts; font licensing, reuse and redistribution rights are unverified. Font URLs are evidence only. Actual rendering and loaded fonts may differ; displayed font names may be simplified.
Collection details
CSS declarations only; browser rendering, cascade, active theme, loaded fonts and official brand guidelines have not been verified. Generated font aliases are normalized for display; exact declarations remain in cssFamily. Colors are semantic declaration samples converted to sRGB, not an exhaustive palette. Font asset URLs are evidence only; license and redistribution rights are unknown.